The project would have been carried out on the same scale and timetable without MNT-ERA.NET
MNT-ERA.NET has speeded up the realisation of the project
MNT-ERA.NET has extended the research scope
MNT-ERA.NET has supported the definition of more ambitious objectives
The project would not have been possible without MNT-ERA.NET

4.2 Did you experience any problems in the project in terms of the following matters?	1	2	3	4	5
Commitment of partners to the project
Instability of consortium, change of partners
Too many participants
Creating concrete co-operation
Partners had different objectives
Change of objectives (own, partners) during the project
Objectives that were too ambitious and unrealistic
Reliability of partners in carrying out subtasks
Varying competence levels among the partners
Cultural differences in communication and working methods
Varying technical solutions and standards
Insufficient financial resources
Ownership and sharing of outcome
Rearrangements in our organisation
A prolonged project and the problems resulting from it
Delayed funding

Yes, we will continue with a project within this consortium
Yes, we will continue separately with an in-house project
No, we will not continue the project

Yes, we will continue cooperating on the same topic
Yes, we will continue cooperating on a different topic
No, the cooperation will not continue

Yes, we will apply for a national project
Yes, we will apply for a bilateral project (e.g. Nordic project)
Yes, we will apply for another ERA-NET project
Yes, we will apply for a EU Framework Programme project
Yes, we will apply in other funding schemes
No, we will not apply for funding
Too early to say

4.6 International Collaboration	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Compared to pure national funding schemes, MNT-ERA.NET offers an attractive alternative for setting up transnational collaboration ***
Compared to other European funding sources, MNT-ERA.NET offers an attractive alternative for setting up transnational collaboration ***