Skip to content.
Skip to navigation
Site Map
Contact
MNT Eranet
You are here:
Home
→
Survey
→
Call review
→
Review of Call 2010
Navigation
About MNT-ERA.NET
EuroNanoForum2011
MNT-ERA.NET Success Stories
Partners and funding programmes
Contact MNT-ERA.NET
Links & Downloads
Survey
Call review
Review of Call 2010
Login
Search
Search
Advanced search
Document Actions
Review of Call 2010
Country
(Required)
-- Please, select --
Austria (FFG)
Belgium/Flanders (IWT)
Czech Republic (CSNMT)
Finland (Tekes)
France (OSEO Innovation)
France/Midi-Pyrénées (CRMP)
Germany (VDI/VDE-IT)
Germany (VDI/TZ)
Hungary (NKTH)
Luxembourg (FNR)
Poland (NCBIR)
Portugal (FCT)
Romania (CNMP)
Slovakia (SAS)
Slovenia (MHEST)
Spain/Basque Country (Innobasque)
Sweden (VINNOVA)
Switzerland (OPET)
Turkey (TUBITAK)
Type of Organisation
(Required)
-- Please, select --
SME
Large industry
Research org.
University
Other
This organisation has applied to MNT-ERA.NET calls in previous years?
(Required)
Yes
No
This organisation is frequently using other transnational funding schemes?
(Required)
Yes
No
Status of project
Yes
No
Proposal is funded
***
Proposal was rejected
***
Project is carried out even without funding
***
Consortium
Number of partners in your project consortium
Did you already know all partners in the consortium from previous project cooperation?
(Required)
Yes
No
If no, how many new partners did you have in this particular consortium?
International Collaboration
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The MNT-ERA.NET Transnational Call is a funding instrument which is complementary to other funding instruments
***
e.g. size of consortium, deadlines
Compared to pure national funding schemes, MNT-ERA.NET offers an attractive alternative of setting up transnational collaboration
***
Compared to other European funding sources, MNT-ERA.NET offers an attractive alternative of setting up transnational collaboration
***
Call Procedure
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The application procedure / workflow was clear and transparent
***
Call website was clear and transparent
***
Guide for proposers was clear and transparent
***
Proposal forms were clear and transparent
***
Submission of proposals was straight and unbureaucratic
***
The funding process (contract negotiation, conditions, transfer of the first funding rate) was efficient and adequate in time
***
The funding process (contract negotiation, conditions, transfer of the first funding rate) was efficient and adequate in effort
***
MNT-ERA.NET feedback during the evaluation phase was clear
***
Interaction with the national agency
Interaction with the national agency was constructive and efficient
(Required)
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Your advice for future MNT-ERA.NET calls
Please add your comments
VDI/VDE-IT
last modified: 2011-05-10 10:54
Print this page