Skip to content. Skip to navigation

MNT Eranet

You are here: Home → Survey → MNT ERA-Net call 2006 Questionnaire

Login

Document Actions

MNT ERA-Net call 2006 Questionnaire

International Collaboration	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
I have experience with transnational projects ***
MNT ERA-Net offers an attractive alternative of setting up transnational collaboration compared to pure national schemes ***
MNT ERA-Net offers an attractive way of funding compared to other European funding sources ***
For my particular project MNT ERA-Net was the most appropriate funding mechanism providing added value through transnational cooperation ***

Call Procedure	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The application procedure was clear and transparent ***
Submission of proposals was straight and unbureaucratic ***
The funding process (contract negotiation, conditions, transfer of the first funding rate) was adequate in time and effort ***

Status of project	Yes	Yes, but in a reduced version	No
Project is carried out even without funding ***

Interaction with the national agency	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Interaction with the national agency was positive and efficient ***
MNT ERA-Net feedback during the evaluation phase was clear ***

Advice for future MNT ERA-Net calls	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
It is important that MNT ERA-Net call deadlines do not overlap with other transnational calls (e.g. FP7, ERA-NETs) ***
The overall call procedures should be significantly improved ***

Type of Organisation (Required)

SME
Industry
Research Institute
Higher Education (University)
Others

General Comments